Buyer's market, seller's market... Chances are, you've heard lots of people throwing these terms around without anyone within earshot actually knowing what they mean. Sure, in the general sense, a buyer's market is good for buyers and a seller's market good for seller's. But how, why, and what the hell does it actually mean? Now, I can't define these terms if you're curious about the market for methamphetamines, but if you're talking real estate, I've got you covered.
In the most general sense, for any product or service, one side's market is when there are more people on the other side of the fence than on your side. So a seller's market is when there are more buyers than there are sellers, which means a few things:
- Buyers have fewer choices
- Buyers run into each other more frequently, creating increased competition
- Due to the first two points, buyers find themselves making higher/better offers for any product that substantially meets their requirements, in order to beat out the competition and because there isn't much else to choose from. At the same time, sellers see this happening and price their products higher. These forces result in price increases. Swap the scenarios in this paragraph to envision a buyer's market.
Ok, now back it up for a second. In order to define buyer's vs. seller's markets in real estate I have to offer a quick lesson in applied math, but I promise I'll keep it short! One of the useful measurements of a market is the absorption rate, which tells us how many homes are selling each month (the number of homes sold over a certain number of months, divided by the number of months). For example, in the past three months in Joliet, 243 homes were sold. So the absorption rate in Joliet over the past three months is 243 / 3 = 81, which means on average 81 homes sell each month. By itself this is not a great indicator of a market, because in Steger there are not even 81 homes available for sale. So to make the absorption rate mean something, we have to factor in the size of the area by dividing the absorption rate into the number of homes that are currently for sale in that area. For example, take Joliet's 577 homes currently for sale and divide it by the absorption rate of 81, and you end up with 7.12. So what is 7.12? We call that the number of months of housing supply. In other words, if no more homes came on the market and homes continued to sell at the current pace, how many months would it take for all of today's inventory to sell? In this case, a little over seven months.
Your next question might be, what does this geeky measurement mean for someone who doesn't care about real estate math? In general, a seller's market is one in which there is less than six months of housing supply, and a buyer's market is one in which there is more than six months of housing supply. (If you're into riding the fence, six months of supply would make it a "balanced market.") Joliet's 7.12 months of supply indicates a market that is mostly balanced but slightly in favor of buyers. And even though in Steger only 28 homes have sold in the past three months, when you divide that into the total active inventory of 65 homes you see there arr 6.96 months of supply in Steger - practically the same as in Joliet.
A few years ago, when the market was in free-fall, in most suburbs there 20+ months of supply. As of the last three months or so, I rarely see them over 10. In one neighborhood in far northwestern Joliet (Greywall Club), where I have a listing that is under contract and ready to close on Friday, the market is like I've never seen it. In the past six months, 12 homes have sold and another 12 are under contract, but only one is available. Take the 12 sold divided by the six-month time period and you get an absorption rate of 2, meaning 2 homes sell each month in this neighborhood. Divide the single active listing by the absorption rate of 2, and you get one-half of one month of housing supply. That's a seller's market to the extreme. And the 12 pending sales show this number won't be going up anytime soon. Case in point: When I listed that home, on my recommendation my client priced her home at the same amount as one down the street which was under contract but was slightly larger and a few years newer. We had a signed contract in less than 30 days for 95% of her asking price. The numbers indicated this neighborhood was in high demand and short supply, and the theory proved true - this sale is rock-solid evidence that prices in that neighborhood are on the rise.
That's not the only place where prices are finally starting to rise, though. Unfortunately, the Chicagoland area is the last major metropolitan area to turn the corner of the housing rebound, but maybe we were just carrying the nation's weight on our broad shoulders. In any event, check out the following data.
MS = Months of supply (remember, <6 = seller's market, >6 = buyer's market)
Median = Median home sale price
'12/'13 = Data covering the three months leading up to 6/3/12 or 6/3/13
MS'12 MS'13 % change Median'12 Median'13 % change
Richton Park 10.44 4.94 -53% $60,657 $95,000 +57%
Matteson 11.31 5.90 -48% $124,500 $115,000 -8%
Homewood 10.00 4.98 -50% $116,800 $130,000 +11%
Orland Park 9.46 7.78 -18% $258,000 $275,000 +7%
Tinley Park 9.62 6.72 -30% $210,500 $205,000 -3%
New Lenox 11.17 7.84 -30% $255,000 $242,200 -5%
The most positive change has been in Richton Park, where since one year ago the months of supply have dropped to half of their year-ago number and the median sale price has increased by a whopping 57%. In all of the areas surveyed, months of supply are significantly less than compared to one year ago. And in three of the areas, median prices have already begun to rise. It's no coincidence that two of the three areas that have experienced the biggest drop in supply have also experience the largest price increases. The others will soon follow.
Back to the question, then, about whether this is a seller's market. Real estate markets are extremely localized, so I never like to paint with broad strokes, but in some areas, yes, this is a seller's market. In other areas where it is still leaning towards buyers, it doesn't appear things will remain that way for long.
Congratulations, we're getting out of this mess.
No comments:
Post a Comment